Thanks for pointing out all of the fallacies in the WSJ article. It's really despicable to look at the one small area where women are perhaps declining in superiority, while ignoring the vast areas of metrics where men are light years behind women.
As is often pointed out, men are as far behind women now, as women were when the whole title IX apparatus was created. There was a national panic back then in favor of women. Now when men are behind? Crickets
Great work in pointing out the bias, Sean.
Thanks for pointing out all of the fallacies in the WSJ article. It's really despicable to look at the one small area where women are perhaps declining in superiority, while ignoring the vast areas of metrics where men are light years behind women.
As is often pointed out, men are as far behind women now, as women were when the whole title IX apparatus was created. There was a national panic back then in favor of women. Now when men are behind? Crickets